Because of Sam Parkins’ recollection, posted earlier on this blog, of his short-lived Boston friend, pianist Richard Twardzik (1931-1955), I obtained a copy of BOUNCIN’ WITH BARTOK: THE INCOMPLETE WORKS OF RICHARD TWARDZIK (Mercury Press, 2008) by Jack Chambers. I have been reading it with fascination for the last few weeks. It is a phenomenal book.
But first, some comments on the Art of Biography. Perhaps from the start, biographies were glowing public records of the lives of Famous Men Who Had Done Something. The accomplishments were heroic, the biographer admiring, even adoring. If the subject had been a bad husband, an ungenerous employer, unpleasant in private, it was not the biographer’s task to record these moments.
When this began to change I cannot pinpoint, but slowly — perhaps with the rise of journalistic muckraking and a public eager for backstairs gossip — the biography began to tell all, lingering over the subject’s revealed flaws. The biographer pretended to look abashed, then told tales. Joyce Carol Oates dubbed this “pathobiography,” books savagely dissecting their subjects in the name of objectivity and completeness. In some of these works, rancor prevails; the biographer seems to hate the subject.
Jazz, that young art, is particularly prone to such sea-changes in its reportage. Consider the shifts in less than a century in the chronicles of Louis, Duke, and Benny — ending with recent books that state that Louis ran out of creative energy somewhere around 1929, that Ellington stole his most famous compositions from his sidemen, and that the King of Swing picked his nose. And Charlie Parker? The books on Bird are worth a book in themselves.
My model for a jazz biographer is the inestimable John Chilton, who loves his heroic figures but has no trouble saying plainly when they are off form in their music or their personal relations. Right behind him is the jazz violin scholar Anthony Barnett, whose book LISTENING FOR HENRY CROWDER is remarkable. And parallel to them is Mark Miller, whose book on Valaida Snow was also published by The Mercury Press. (Miller has a great deal of energy and is finishing a biography of pianist Herbie Nichols, a book I look forward to.)
Much of this philosophical strife I refer to above comes from our puzzlement with the Great Artist who seems to be A Bad Man or at least seriously flawed. Twardzik doesn’t entirely fit, but he seems to have been immature, half-formed, self-absorbed in everything but his music. Dick’s music astonished those who heard it, and the evidence in his short discography suggests that he was clearly original, clearly going someplace new. Happily, the small discography is slowly growing larger with new concert recordings made with Chet Baker in the last months of Twardzik’s life, practice tapes, live radio broadcasts from Boston.
Perhaps it will seem odd that I am less interested in Twardzik’s music than in his life, more interested in his biography than either. It brings up what is, to me, one of the great questions: what can we know about anyone, particularly when that person has died? What are the tensions between any gathering of evidence and the person it might attempt to portray? In this spirit, I was thrilled by Barnett’s book on Crowder, although I did not find Crowder an enthralling subject.
Biographer Jack Chambers has to his credit an academic career in linguistics and a well-regarded Miles Davis biography; although he never met Twardzik, he was intrigued by the pianist’s recordings when he was a high school student in 1956. So this book is the result of a half-century of fascination, and it is admirably thorough, with color plates of Dick’s father’s paintings, reproductions of Twardzik’s handwriting, his one remaining manuscript, his self-caricature, envelopes, photographs, and more. It is, by definition, an “authorized biography,” drawing its strength from the four cartons of personal effects Dick’s family had saved. Those cartons are an irreplaceable treasure, but they must also have been somewhat of a burden, carrying with them the family’s wish that their doomed young man be treated fairly, generously. And Chambers, while recording everything, is more than fair. Twardzik must have been, at times, an irritating young man — even before he became addicted to heroin — and Chambers occasionally seems in part a fine, careful journalist, offering all the facts, in part resembling an indulgent uncle, sure that his beloved nephew had good reasons to act that way. Watching Chambers negotiate such delicate issues, one hairpin turn after another, is one of the delights of the book. At times, the thoroughness is just this side of wearying — but Chambers is compelled to include what is relevant alongside what might be relevant, knowing that there will probably never be another biography of Twardzik.
And he has done his job so well that perhaps there never needs to be another one. From the personal narrative that begins the book — his own involvement with Twardzik’s music — to his study of the family, Dick’s parents seen close up, Dick’s childhood, early musical involvements, intersections with people as diverse as Herb Pomeroy, Serge Chaloff, and Lionel Hampton (the latter particularly fascinating), with Charlie Parker, Rudy Van Gelder, Bob Zieff, and Chet Baker — this book is meticulous in its techniques and results. Interviews give way to newspaper clippings which give way to personal letters and pay stubs — all the way up to the hotel room where the 24-year old Twardzik is found dead with a needle in his arm. Ironically, the last thirty-six days of Twardzik’s life are examined most closely because so much detail exists, and Chambers does not stop there, offering sad, grueling examinations of what happened after, including a reproduction of the form listing the dead man’s effects.
Chambers is also a capable writer, and occasionally he gets it in a sentence. My favorite is his description of the place where Twardzik played a summer gig in 1951:
The atmosphere of the West Yarmouth hall is captured in a set of grainy black and white snapshots that were found among Twardzik’s effects. The high ceiling gives some idea of the size of the room. The bandstand appears to be pushed up against a booth, and similar vinyl-covered booths may have ringed the room. The tables had Formica tops, like common kitchen tables of the day. The main feature of the decor appears to be indestructibility.
I would give a great deal to have written that last sentence.
The book is carefully done, with what must be the best discography of Twardzik to date, although it would not surprise me if its appearance caused some new discoveries to appear, suddenly. I hope that the broadcast with tenorist Sam Margolis is issued someday: Margolis, Ruby Braff’s Boston pal, was a fine player in the Lester-Bud Freeman school, someone I was fortunate enough to see and talk with in the early Seventies.
Even if you don’t know Twardzik’s music, this book is essential reading. We should all be so lovingly and carefully remembered.
Well – good, and agreed. I hope Jack Chambers sees your review. We’ve had quite a bit of correspondence since I read the book – I find him a delightful guy who really cares.
New topic: Both Dick Sudhalter and Jim Collier, who has a vested interest in Louis, said about the biographer you praise, “You can take Chilton to the bank”…sp
I knew Twardzik slightly as a student at New England. He would occasionally visit the apartment that I shared with 2 other NEC students to practice in the dingy living room which had two dirty windows looking out on Symphony Road. It had only DC electricity neccessitating a noisy AC converter. It was a thoroughly and depressing blue collar neighborhood with the air shaft in our building occasionally ampliyng the drunken fight of some of the habitues. Twardzik had a kind of crush on my pianist fiancee. I heard him in Cambridge one night when Bob Ceely and I visited some club in or near Cambridge. He kept inserting the “Minute Waltz’ in his solos. Figured he must have just learned it. Bob has better recollection of that evening than I. Previous to Symphony Rd. I had I roomed with Cecil T and of course Taylor knew him and they were kind of competitive admirers. Hello to Sam Parkins who was on the NEC scene as well. I look forward to reading the book – in spite of Dick’s sad hegira. Hank Duckham
Pingback: Obscure Object of Desire II (a book review) | Ottawa Citizen Blogs