I have no problem understanding taste.  I admire Charlie Shavers; you prefer Shorty Baker.  I think that the 1938 Basie band and the 1940 Ellington band were high points in civilization; you choose, instead, Lunceford and Miller.  Fine, and we need not snarl at each other on the street.  I can even understand the anonymous YouTube lone disliker — out of a sea of thumbs up, there’s one person who thinks, “That’s not so good.”  And I know that criticism is not new to this century, as Nicolas Slominsky has shown: for one example, I have read that the audience at the Apollo Theatre’s Amateur Night was savage and satirical in its disapproval of performers who weren’t up to what the audience thought was the standard.

I have worked hard to acquire some equanimity when faced with negative responses to videos and posts I have created for JAZZ LIVES.  When people comment negatively in either sphere, I can simply make the comment go away, leaving a faint bad smell until I open the window.  However, some of the comments are so acrid that they make me get up from the computer and do something else for a few minutes.  Typically, someone doesn’t approve of the angle from which I am videoing (assuming, I guess, that I am using several people and a multi-camera perspective) — especially if one of the performers is an attractive woman whom the male commenter doesn’t see enough of.  In that case, if the spirit moves me, I gently explain the limitations of a single-camera setup or of my desire to not get walloped by someone’s swingout, or other factors that the commenter may not have understood.  And in many cases, my calm approach gets a calm apologetic response, which is gratifying.

In other situations, the prose is darker.  I shoot videos in places where — you’ll be horrified — people drink alcohol, eat food, and converse . . . as opposed to videoing in the Sistine Chapel.  Thus, many viewers write in to me in a near-rage: “I’d like to shoot the people who were talking while this great band was playing!” I do understand, but the impulse — even rhetorical — is frightening in this century, and again I try to write a calm explanatory note.  (Years of being a college professor have left their mark on me in a gentle moral didacticism.)  I have also said that yelling at people in a video shot five years ago will have little effect on making them quieter.

If the commenter, in either case, continues to fume in response, I will often suggest that he should ask for a refund.  Rimshot.  And no one has written in to ask for one, for obvious reasons.

I understand that there are situations were sharp criticism in public from a nameless “reviewer” is not only appropriate but helpful.  If I go to a restaurant and something makes me ill, in writing about my experience I might be warning others away so that they did not have to spend hours in the bathroom.  If my painter, lawyer, doctor, or other professional does a poor job, there might be good reason to say so in public.  (I would hope, though, that the first line of response would be to contact the restaurant or the professional, as a courtesy.)

But a video that someone disapproves of has no power to do harm, and one can always shut it off, muttering, “Wow, that’s awful,” to oneself.

All of this distresses me, not because people are not “entitled to their own opinion,” but because it seems ungenerous to criticize a product or a production that is offered open-handedly and for free.  And the criticism is often voiced in a coarse unfeeling way.  Of course, this tendency is amplified by the anonymity of the commenters, who are not asked to offer their credentials in evaluating artistic performance.  The man — and the commenters are all men — who says that X is a rottten trumpeter is never asked to demonstrate his own ability on the horn by playing C JAM BLUES, even in Bb.

But anonymity gives courage.  Thus, this comment on a YouTube video of mine this morning.  The subject, a singer I respect greatly, someone with classical training and jazz experience, accompanied by a pianist: “Listening to that whiney voice instead of the sense of the song…horrible nonsense..he’s good but who can tell w that phony warbling…yikes”

That approach and that language seems abusive.  I imagine that few artists read the YouTube comments, but why should someone doing their best be skewered by a nameless “reviewer”?  Would the commenter have the courage to go up to an artist in a club and say, “Your whiney voice is horrible nonsense and phony warbling?”  I would guess not, for fear of getting whacked with an RCA ribbon mike.  And stand.  And I would dearly like to be on the jury to vote for the musician’s acquittal and then award damages in a lawsuit.

I wonder if there is some motivation I am overlooking.  Does it make the commenter feel superior?  “I am an experienced music critic, and everyone is entitled to my opinion, as a public service?  Or does it come out of a silent insecurity?  “X makes CDs and is famous.  Why doesn’t anyone want to give me a gig like that?  I hate X!”

What I suspect, and hope I am wrong, is that it is yet another manifestation of general pervasive mean-spiritedness, that there are hate-filled people in the world who have not got enough to occupy themselves, so they rack up disapproval right and left.  That makes me sad.  Someone once said, “If you’re not being loving, why are you taking up space on the planet?”  True enough.

Something to end this sad essay on a hopeful note: music that no one can disapprove of:

May your happiness increase!



  1. For each one of these faceless and petty voices criticizing you for sharing the beautiful work of countless hardworking musicians, there are many, many other people proud to identify themselves when they appreciate all that Michael Steinman does for hot music, the jazz community, and so many minds and souls.

  2. Michael Hashim

    Somewhat sad,yes, but a necessary essay on a topic so many of us ignore. Thank you, Michael!

  3. John Jamie Evans

    Michael, I am surprised as far as I know that it has taken this long for you to comment on the malevolence of “keyboard warriors” as they are sometimes called. As a retired journalist I write online critiques on sports, cinema and jazz (on my own website “Alan Cooper Remembered” which you will I am sure remember). I have been abused for the whole gamut of alleged sins – being “old”, ignorant, and far worse. Why? All I have done is make comments on matters which I love and not everybody will agree of course. One of the best yet was some bone-brain who posted a one-word message on a You-Tube track of a Coops quartet version of “Undecided”. The verdict of that sage was “Trite”. It probably was but so what? There are a thousand cliches but one will do – carry on regardless. – Jamie.

  4. Frederick Ollison

    Stay the course. It’s a great website.

  5. You need not worry, dear Mr. Ollson. It gives me too much joy. As does your comment. Thank you, Michael

  6. Michael. Chill.

  7. Written coolly, as you (a connoisseur of prose) would notice. Cathartic rather than rage-laden.

  8. Girish Trivedi

    Very well written – a good pen. Compliments.


  9. Michel Bastide

    I agree +++

  10. Chris Hodgkins

    Hello Michael. Very disappointing to read of the one or two who spoil it for the many. I find your blog and postings informative, helpful, useful, interesting and you have a deep knowledge and understanding of jazz. You undertake this enterprise as you have a passion for jazz – you certainly do not do it for money or Amazon would have piled in by now. Edmund Burke summed these complainants up when he said ” It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.”

    Please keep the posts coming and many thanks for all your work. Kindest regards. Chris Hodgkins.

  11. Keep recording & sharing ! Forget the naysayers , or spit them out quickly. Your blog and videos nurture many … many. I at least take a peek every day, often play a couple clips, usually click ‘like’ … never dislike. Thank you for all of your efforts ! I’m a big Tuba Skinny fan but enjoy other trad jazz artists, much of ‘Swing’, and an eclectic range from folk to classical to rock-n-roll.

  12. One thing I always appreciate about your writing is its positive tone, the fact that you get negative comments never occurred to me although I shouldn’t be surprised as it is rampant on the internet. Keep on the sunny side of the street!

  13. Cleber Guimaraes Ferreira

    Great post Micheal. I really enjoy a good criticism in my work because it’s help me a lot, but some people are just nonsense…

  14. There is a lot of free-floating rage out there, most of it justified but which cannot find an outlet — a redress of grievances — so it gets directed in inappropriate ways. It’s the very toxic times we are living through.

    Look through most Youtube threads and it takes just a few comments till the personal abuse sets in.

    If you are forced to endure too much of this stuff then disabling commenting would be justified. Although such directed at the content of this blog — an obvious labor of ongoing love — is almost comically nutso.

    Anyway, thanks for posting that mini-Masterpiece “That’s For Me”. For he or she who does not dig Pops…not even a divine intervention would be of much help.

  15. Prompted by this post, I went looking for comments on MJJB videos and I was not disappointed: “Not bad. The song was too boring though. It was a nice toon and all, but there was no build up. No shout chorus. You ended the same way you started. Maybe by changing octaves, crescendos and some more adjustments in articulation, you can make the piece more interesting to listen to. I like what you have so you should improve on it.” NotJuicy, this recording of One Girl and Two Boys was not intended to appeal to you and, for reasons, shall remain the same. XOXO Laura 😉

  16. “NotJuicy,” indeed. How very apt. You tell ’em, Miss S!

  17. Late to the party as always! – but chin up, Sir. Your work speaks for itself and anybody who really knows their onions values it immensely.

  18. Never too late. And from personal observation, I will state that Nicholas D. Ball’s time is always splendid. Happiness to you, Sir!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s